Reflection 2.1

For my reflection, the first thought about writing this was that it was going to be easy. It was nothing close to easy. I had so many questions I had to ask and look up before I could get a close idea of what the paper was suppose to sound like and look like. I thought I was going to use the examples in class, but I remembered the some of the examples in class were more semi rogerian works. I felt I just didn’t get a template of what a rogerian piece of work was suppose to have. I tried to follow guides that explain what was needed for each section of the paper, but I still felt it was a lot harder than the rebuttal. That really sums up the problems while writing the paper that I had, but the second problem I had was the topic. I just wasn’t sure if I was allowed or should do the death penalty again. I felt it would be a good idea to write another style of paper for the same topic, but also to choose the other side so I get a whole different perspective. If I am allowed to, ill probably keep with death penalty again, but I would just change my perspective on the issue. I feel I had a lot of trouble (and it did reflect on my first draft) because I just haven’t read many of these arguments. Like it was stated in class, it is a style of writing that isn’t used all the time. I just have to get to read more and get a feel on how to construct these papers and how they are suppose to feel. This is the one thing I feel I am struggling on the most.