Reflection 2.2

For my second draft, I felt my thoughts were clearer on this paper. I feel this paper is a lot better than my first one and I do have a lot more sources that work towards my paper. I need to ask a couple of questions about my academic sources, but other than that, I should almost be set on my sources. I remember at group conferences that many people said my opinion was missing and that I was not taking a stand at any point. I made it clear what stand I was going to take for this paper. I still have some questions about the rogerian idea of the argument. I am just not sure if my paper is rogerian enough. Like I try not to point fingers and I do have a compromise at the end. I try to set up situations where it explains the problem of the death penalty and leave them open ended, but I feel that is not enough for a rogerian argument. That is the main problem I feel my paper is going through.